Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Monday, March 4, 2013
Sunday Sermon Critique
Let’s do a quick check about the message you heard in church yesterday:
God has promised that His Word will not be unfruitful (Is 55:11). If there is a lack of fruit in our mind (“I didn’t get anything out of the sermon today”), it is our fault.
So here are a few suggestions for how to listen to a message…
1. Prior to the message, ask God to reveal His truth to you through prayer.
2. Prior to the message, ask God to speak through the pastor.
3. Be in an attitude of submission to God and His Word as it is proclaimed.
4. Listen for God’s Spirit to speak to you through His Word.
5. After the message, meditate on it and discuss it with others.
(borrowed from a friend)
Question 1: What was the pastor’s text?The purpose of corporate worship is to encounter God through preaching. When we attend worship our goal should be to hear a word from God for the purpose of drawing closer to Him and becoming more like Christ. The message is not to entertain us, it is to glorify God and proclaim His truth… otherwise it is a failure. If the minister proclaims God’s Truth, and you don’t get anything out of the message… there is a problem and it doesn’t lie with the speaker.
Question 2: What was the text’s main truth?
Question 3: How were you challenged to be more like Christ from the message?
God has promised that His Word will not be unfruitful (Is 55:11). If there is a lack of fruit in our mind (“I didn’t get anything out of the sermon today”), it is our fault.
So here are a few suggestions for how to listen to a message…
1. Prior to the message, ask God to reveal His truth to you through prayer.
2. Prior to the message, ask God to speak through the pastor.
3. Be in an attitude of submission to God and His Word as it is proclaimed.
4. Listen for God’s Spirit to speak to you through His Word.
5. After the message, meditate on it and discuss it with others.
(borrowed from a friend)
Saturday, December 22, 2012
TheX in Christmas is used like the R in R.C. My given name at birth was Robert Charles, although before I was even taken home from the hospital my parents called me by my initials, R.C., and nobody seems to
be too scandalized by that.
X can mean so many things. For example, when we want to denote an unknown quantity, we use the symbol X. It can refer to an obscene level of films, something that is X-rated. People seem to express chagrin about seeing Christ's name dropped and replaced by this symbol for an unknown quantity X. Every year you see the signs and the bumper stickers saying, "Put Christ back into Christmas" as a response to this substitution of the letter X for the name of Christ.
There's no X in Christmas
First of all, you have to understand that it is not the letter X that is put into Christmas. We see the English letter X there, but actually what it involves is the first letter of the Greek name for Christ. Christos is the New Testament Greek for Christ. The first letter of the Greek word Christos is transliterated into our alphabet as an X. That X has come through church history to be a shorthand symbol for the name of Christ.
We don't see people protesting the use of the Greek letter theta, which is an O with a line across the middle. We use that as a shorthand abbreviation for God because it is the first letter of the word Theos, the Greek word for God.
X has a long and sacred history
The idea of X as an abbreviation for the name of Christ came into use in our culture with no intent to show any disrespect for Jesus. The church has used the symbol of the fish historically because it is an acronym. Fish in Greek (ichthus) involved the use of the first letters for the Greek phrase "Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior." So the early Christians would take the first letter of those words and put those letters together to spell the Greek word for fish. That's how the symbol of the fish became the universal symbol of Christendom. There's a long and sacred history of the use of X to symbolize the name of Christ, and from its origin, it has meant no disrespect.
Adapted from Now, That’s a Good Question! ©1996 by R.C. Sproul. Used by permission of Tyndale.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Man and The Birds by Paul Harvey
Paul
Harvey and “The Man and the Birds a Christmas Story” Remembered
The man to whom I’m going to
introduce you was not a scrooge, he was a kind decent, mostly good man.
Generous to his family, upright in his dealings with other men. But he just
didn’t believe all that incarnation stuff which the churches proclaim at
Christmas Time. It just didn’t make sense and he was too honest to pretend
otherwise. He just couldn’t swallow the Jesus Story, about God coming to Earth
as a man.
“I’m truly sorry to distress you,”
he told his wife, “but I’m not going with you to church this Christmas Eve.” He
said he’d feel like a hypocrite. That he’d much rather just stay at home, but
that he would wait up for them. And so he stayed and they went to the midnight
service.
Shortly after the family drove away
in the car, snow began to fall. He went to the window to watch the flurries
getting heavier and heavier and then went back to his fireside chair and began
to read his newspaper. Minutes later he was startled by a thudding sound…Then
another, and then another. Sort of a thump or a thud…At first he thought
someone must be throwing snowballs against his living room window. But when he
went to the front door to investigate he found a flock of birds huddled
miserably in the snow. They’d been caught in the storm and, in a desperate
search for shelter, had tried to fly through his large landscape window.
Well, he couldn’t let the poor
creatures lie there and freeze, so he remembered the barn where his children
stabled their pony. That would provide a warm shelter, if he could direct the
birds to it. Quickly he put on a coat, galoshes, tramped through the deepening
snow to the barn. He opened the doors wide and turned on a light, but the birds
did not come in. He figured food would entice them in. So he hurried back to
the house, fetched bread crumbs, sprinkled them on the snow, making a trail to
the yellow-lighted wide open doorway of the stable. But to his dismay, the
birds ignored the bread crumbs, and continued to flap around helplessly in the
snow. He tried catching them…He tried shooing them into the barn by walking
around them waving his arms…Instead, they scattered in every direction, except
into the warm, lighted barn.
And then, he realized that they were
afraid of him. To them, he reasoned, I am a strange and terrifying creature. If
only I could think of some way to let them know that they can trust me…That I
am not trying to hurt them, but to help them. But how? Because any move he made
tended to frighten them, confuse them. They just would not follow. They would
not be led or shooed because they feared him.
“If only I could be a bird,” he
thought to himself, “and mingle with them and speak their language. Then I
could tell them not to be afraid. Then I could show them the way to safe,
warm…to the safe warm barn. But I would have to be one of them so they could
see, and hear and understand.” At that moment the church bells began to ring.
The sound reached his ears above the sounds of the wind. And he stood there
listening to the bells – Adeste Fidelis – listening to the bells pealing the
glad tidings of Christmas. And he sank to his knees in the snow.
Monday, December 3, 2012
The Touch of God at Christmas
The Touch of God at Christmas
This is from a 60 Minutes broadcast from a few years ago. It’s an excerpt of what Harry Reasoner said around Christmas time that I want you to hear. Listen carefully – he said:
Eleven years ago I did a little Christmas piece and it seemed like a good idea to repeat it. The basis for this tremendous burst of buying things and gift buying and parties and near hysteria is a quiet event that Christians believe actually happened a long time ago. You can say that in all societies there has always been a midwinter festival and that many of the trappings of our Christmas are almost violently pagan. But you come back to the central fact of the day and the quietness of Christmas morning, the birth of God on earth.
It leaves you only three ways of accepting Christmas. One is cynically, as a time to make money and endorse the making of it. One is graciously, that’s the appropriate attitude for non-Christians who wish their fellow citizens all the joys to which their beliefs entitle them. And the third, of course, is reverently.
If this is the anniversary of the appearance of the Lord of the universe in the form of a helpless babe, it is a very important day. It is a startling idea, of course. The whole story that a virgin was selected by God to bear his son as a way of showing his love and concern for man. It’s my guess that in spite of all the lip service given to it, it’s not an idea that has been popular with theologians. It is somewhat an illogical idea and theologians like logic almost as much as they like God. It’s so revolutionary, a thought that it probably could only come from God that is beyond logic and beyond theology. It is a magnificent appeal. Almost nobody has seen God and almost nobody has any real idea what he is like, and the truth is that among men the idea of seeing God suddenly and standing in a very bright light is not necessarily a completely comforting or appealing idea.
But everyone has seen babies and almost everyone likes them. If God wanted to be loved as well as feared, He moved correctly, for a baby growing up learns all about people. And if God wanted to be intimately a part of man, He moved correctly, for the experience of birth and family-hood is the most intimate and precious experience that any of us will ever have.
So it comes beyond logic. It is either a falsehood or it is the truest thing in the world. It is the story of the great innocence of God the baby. God in the power of man has such a dramatic shock toward the heart that if it is not true to Christians, then nothing is true.
So if a person is touched only once a year, the touching is still worth it. And maybe on some given Christmas some final quiet morning, that touch will take. The touch of God coming into this world as a vulnerable baby.
This is from a 60 Minutes broadcast from a few years ago. It’s an excerpt of what Harry Reasoner said around Christmas time that I want you to hear. Listen carefully – he said:
Eleven years ago I did a little Christmas piece and it seemed like a good idea to repeat it. The basis for this tremendous burst of buying things and gift buying and parties and near hysteria is a quiet event that Christians believe actually happened a long time ago. You can say that in all societies there has always been a midwinter festival and that many of the trappings of our Christmas are almost violently pagan. But you come back to the central fact of the day and the quietness of Christmas morning, the birth of God on earth.
It leaves you only three ways of accepting Christmas. One is cynically, as a time to make money and endorse the making of it. One is graciously, that’s the appropriate attitude for non-Christians who wish their fellow citizens all the joys to which their beliefs entitle them. And the third, of course, is reverently.
If this is the anniversary of the appearance of the Lord of the universe in the form of a helpless babe, it is a very important day. It is a startling idea, of course. The whole story that a virgin was selected by God to bear his son as a way of showing his love and concern for man. It’s my guess that in spite of all the lip service given to it, it’s not an idea that has been popular with theologians. It is somewhat an illogical idea and theologians like logic almost as much as they like God. It’s so revolutionary, a thought that it probably could only come from God that is beyond logic and beyond theology. It is a magnificent appeal. Almost nobody has seen God and almost nobody has any real idea what he is like, and the truth is that among men the idea of seeing God suddenly and standing in a very bright light is not necessarily a completely comforting or appealing idea.
But everyone has seen babies and almost everyone likes them. If God wanted to be loved as well as feared, He moved correctly, for a baby growing up learns all about people. And if God wanted to be intimately a part of man, He moved correctly, for the experience of birth and family-hood is the most intimate and precious experience that any of us will ever have.
So it comes beyond logic. It is either a falsehood or it is the truest thing in the world. It is the story of the great innocence of God the baby. God in the power of man has such a dramatic shock toward the heart that if it is not true to Christians, then nothing is true.
So if a person is touched only once a year, the touching is still worth it. And maybe on some given Christmas some final quiet morning, that touch will take. The touch of God coming into this world as a vulnerable baby.
Monday, November 12, 2012
Christian One-liners
Found these "Christian" One-Liners on Twitter...thought some laughter would be good for a monday.
Hey girl,
whenever I read Proverbs 31, I think about you.
I didn't
believe in predestination until tonight.
It took God 7
days to change the world, it only takes 7 digits for you to change mine.
Hey, I was
reading through the book of Numbers... and I realized, I don't have yours.
If you're
looking for your knight in shining armor, I happen to be wearing the full armor
of God.
Your beauty alone
can make a blind man see.
You and me,
we’re like loaves and fishes…we just might be a miracle.
God was just
showing off when He made you
The word says
'Give drink to those who are thirsty, and feed the hungry'; how about dinner?
Now I know why
Solomon had 700 wives. He never met someone like you.
Maybe God
wasn't the only "Crazy Love" Francis Chan was talking about...
Hi. My name is
Will. God's Will.
If we were
around with Noah then you.. Me... Pair.
Me. You. Song
of Songs: the remix.
How many times
do I have to march around you before you fall for me?
I would say
"God bless you", but it looks like He already has.
I believe one
of my ribs belongs to you.
You are so
fearfully and wonderfully made
Don't worry,
I'll sit next to you in prayer so that we can hold hands.
Ayeee boy, you
put the STUD in bible study
If I marched
around you seven times, would you fall for me?
You make me feel like Samson with his hair cut
off: weak in the knees.
"I heard
Jesus called you... How about I do the same?"
Sunday, November 11, 2012
If I Were Satan
If I were Satan . . .
I would focus on the churches. I would get members to demand their own preferences. I would urge them to complain about the length of the pastor’s sermons and the color of the carpet. I would set member against member to fight over the right worship style. And I would make the business meeting the time where the most carnal members spoke and fight and destroyed.
If I were Satan . . .
I would encourage church members to avoid high levels of commitment. I would remind them that they are there to get their needs met. I would whisper to them that they shouldn’t be involved in ministry, because that’s why they pay the pastor and staff. And I would urge them to fight one another over tertiary and minor doctrinal issues. I would encourage Christians to identify themselves by their tertiary doctrinal stand and to exclude anyone else who does not match their precise standards.
If I were Satan . . .
I would let the leaders know that it’s okay to minimize and avoid the truths of God’s Word. I would encourage them to preach less Bible and deal with more relevant issues. I would make certain that small groups barely dealt with Scripture, but instead spent most of their time talking about sports, gossip, and politics. I would suggest that members do not need to spend time in the Bible on their own; a thirty minute sermon each week is sufficient time.
If I were Satan . . .
I would make certain church members understood that evangelism is not relevant in today’s society. I would tempt leaders to stay away from urging members to be engaged in gospel sharing lest they offend someone. I would dissuade everyone in the church to think about hell. It’s really better to keep it at as an abstract concept rather contemplating the eternal consequences of rejecting Christ. And I would tell church leaders to send their called pastors and missionaries to seminaries where evangelism is an afterthought.
If I were Satan . . .
I would whisper to Christians in the church not to think about abortion. It is politically incorrect and unpopular to broach the subject. I would tell them not to focus on the reality that over one million babies are killed each year in the United States alone. I would make sure they didn’t know that, in the time of a one-hour worship service in church, more than 130 babies were killed in the United States. I would let them know that it’s okay not to dwell on the greatest slaughter of humanity in the history of our nation.
If I were Satan . . .
I would keep church members so busy that they wouldn’t have time to pray. I would make certain that the leaders are discouraged from ever mentioning prayer as a priority in their congregations. I would assure the members that a brief time of prayer during a brief worship service is sufficient for the totality of their prayer lives. I would indeed do all I could to keep people from prayer, because it’s such a threat to me and my power.
If I were Satan . . .
And if I could do all these things, I am sure I would see churches across America void of power. I would see most churches in both spiritual and numerical decline. I would see Christian fighting Christian. I would see apathy, discouragement, dropout, and disillusionment. And I would look over the landscape of American churches, and I would see all of my victories. Then I would roar with pleasure at the new church order I see, and I would declare:
“It is good.”
“Indeed, it is very good.”
(copied from Thom Rainer)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
